Why do we tend to focus š§āāļø on the outcome rather than the process?
- Vishal Das
- May 6, 2023
- 1 min read
Updated: Jul 3, 2024

We donāt š control the outcome.
Decisions are entirely a matter of weighing probabilitiesāļøāāāš°.
Letās take an example from behavioral finance, - loss aversionšš§āš».
For good evolutionary šreasons, humans' loss, averse when choosing between risky ā ļøoutcomes.
More specifically, a loss āhas two and a half times the impact of a gain of the same size. So, we like to be right ā and often look for high-probability events.
A focusš§on probabilities is fine when outcomes are symmetric but completely inappropriate when the payoffs are skewed.
(For starters, please refer to 1stšcomment)
Take the example of options:
Suppose š¤that around 90% of options positions lose moneyš¶. Does this mean that owing options is a bad idea?
Wait, the answer lies in how much money š°you make on the 10% of options positions that a profitable.
For example, if you buy 10 options at Rs.1, each, and nine of them expired, worthless, but the 10th goes up to Rs.25, you will have a terrible probability of success, but a tidy š¤profit.
Show some high probability propositions are unattractive, and some low probability propositions a very attractive on an expected value basis. say there is a 75% chance that a stock price šµfor perfection will hit its earning numbers so goes up š1%, but thereās a 25% chance that the company will mess with the forecast and go down byš10%. the stock offers a high probability but on negative expected value.
Always remember that decisions are a matter of weighing probabilities, so be aware the next time you forecast top line in valuations. Don't follow my views, at least start doubting others.
Commentaires