top of page

Why do we tend to focus šŸ§˜ā€ā™‚ļø on the outcome rather than the process?

Updated: Jul 3, 2024


We don’t šŸ™…control the outcome.


Decisions are entirely a matter of weighing probabilitiesāœ–ļøāž—āž•āž–šŸŸ°.


Let’s take an example from behavioral finance, - loss aversionšŸ“‰šŸ§‘ā€šŸ’».


For good evolutionary šŸŒreasons, humans' loss, averse when choosing between risky āš ļøoutcomes.


More specifically, a loss āŒhas two and a half times the impact of a gain of the same size. So, we like to be right āœ…and often look for high-probability events.


A focus🧐on probabilities is fine when outcomes are symmetric but completely inappropriate when the payoffs are skewed.

(For starters, please refer to 1stšŸ‘‡comment)



Take the example of options:



Suppose šŸ¤”that around 90% of options positions lose moneyšŸ’¶. Does this mean that owing options is a bad idea?


Wait, the answer lies in how much money šŸ’°you make on the 10% of options positions that a profitable.


For example, if you buy 10 options at Rs.1, each, and nine of them expired, worthless, but the 10th goes up to Rs.25, you will have a terrible probability of success, but a tidy šŸ¤‘profit.


Show some high probability propositions are unattractive, and some low probability propositions a very attractive on an expected value basis. say there is a 75% chance that a stock price šŸ’µfor perfection will hit its earning numbers so goes up šŸ“ˆ1%, but there’s a 25% chance that the company will mess with the forecast and go down byšŸ“‰10%. the stock offers a high probability but on negative expected value.



Always remember that decisions are a matter of weighing probabilities, so be aware the next time you forecast top line in valuations. Don't follow my views, at least start doubting others.



Recent Posts

See All

Commentaires

NotƩ 0 Ʃtoile sur 5.
Pas encore de note

Ajouter une note
bottom of page